Home > Games, Programming, Reversing, Windows > WardenMimic v20090723a

WardenMimic v20090723a

July 23rd, 2009

New build of WardenMimic. I held on to it because I got word of a new build in the near future, I wanted to give them a chance to maybe fix some of their shit. The changelog says they’ve improved their anti-detection, but my checks say otherwise. This is confirmed working on v54, but should work on previous builds too (shit, I think pretty much all of their builds are vulnerable to this particular hole).

There are still plenty more holes left though so don’t worry, I’m not taking all the fun away from Blizzard, just a bit of it.

WardenMimic v20090723a

Let the drama begin!

  1. rille
    July 25th, 2009 at 09:24 | #1

    sweet. mimic fails again

  2. July 28th, 2009 at 01:27 | #2

    To be honest, you have no idea how much I enjoy watching them being humiliated. You’re doing a pretty good job ;p
    I also like the way they send in script kiddies to your blog every now and then in order to try and defend themselves LOL.
    Aye, who’d agree on a biased opinion anyway? I know I wouldn’t..
    They say their bots are safe, when they’re not, you’re actually doing an excellent job revealing that poorly-written mimic bullshit.
    You saved my account from the banwave btw, I check mmowned on a daily basis (and yes, I am one of those donating-leechers) and when you first released the detection code, I stopped using it right away, and thus not losing my account, as for the other self-indulgent, unable-to-question-shit bastards - they most certainly got what they deserved.. “no waiz can mimic be detected!1!!1″ That proved ‘em wrong!! lmao

    And keep up with the criticism/cynicism.. It does wonders
    You kinda remind me of George Carlin.. meh, too bad the old fuck died last year

    All the best from Bulgaria ;p

  3. July 28th, 2009 at 13:49 | #3

    Haha thanks. George Carlin was awesome!

  4. SomoN
    July 28th, 2009 at 17:09 | #4

    Btw, know any similar comedians?

  5. July 28th, 2009 at 21:26 | #5

    Heh, good question. Not sure.

  1. No trackbacks yet.